Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement
Get A Sneak Peek At P4P
Even if your home health agency (HHA) is not in one of the seven states in the pay for performance (P4P) demonstration project, you'll want to take a close look at the project's structure.
Ready or not: That's because it could at least partly mirror the overall P4P system that observers expect to hit the entire home health agency industry within a few years.
Here are the basics of the project:
Where: Agencies in four regions are eligible to participate--West (California), South (Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee), Midwest (Illinois) and Northeast (Connecticut, Massachusetts). The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and its P4P contractor, Abt Associates, will make calculations for rewards by region.
Who: CMS and Abt will randomly split the volunteer agencies into two groups--control and experimental. For the control group, nothing will change and they'll get extra data reports on their patients only after the demo is over. The experimental group will be eligible for P4P payments and will receive their data during the project.
Abt is including only Medicare fee-for-service patients in the demo calculations. That will exclude Medicaid patients and those in Medicare managed care plans.
"We are happy that the calculation of the performance measures will be based solely on Medicare fee-for-service patients," applauds Brian Ellsworth with the Connecticut Association for Home Care. CMS and Abt originally planned to include all patients currently used in outcome-based quality improvement (OBQI) calculations.
When: CMS and Abt now are recruiting for the project that's set to begin Jan. 1 and run for two years. The project will cover the time the patient is on service and 30 days after discharge from home health.
What: The P4P demonstration project will reward agencies that are "top performers" and "top improvers," Abt's Henry Goldberg explained at an Oct. 9 session of the National Association for Home Care & Hospice's annual meeting in Denver.
How: Calculations for the project are complicated, with Goldberg showing multiple slides on determining demo winners. CMS and Abt will use 75 percent of the reward pool to fund incentive payments to the top 20 percent of agencies. CMS and Abt will make separate calculations for each of the seven measures in the project and they will calculate each of the four regions separately.
Payments for each measure are based on its relative weight. So, payments for hospitalization and emergency room measures will be more than for the other measures.
CMS and Abt will use the remaining 25 percent of the reward pool to fund incentive payments for the 20 percent of agencies that improve the most over their previous year's performance.
Exceptions: CMS and Abt won't reward agencies that are in the bottom 30 percent of performers, no matter how much they improve. And they won't pay agencies that improve if they are also top performers. In other words, you can only get paid once for each measure--either as a top performer or as a top improver.
Caveat: CMS won't pay out any money if the Medicare program fails to see overall savings on the patients in the demonstration. Abt will use claims data from all Medicare providers to see whether Medicare paid out less for patients in the experimental group versus the control group.
If the Medicare program doesn't see savings--for example, from reduced hospitalizations--then agencies won't receive incentive payments even if they are top performers or improvers.
Why: CMS is running the demo to see how agencies respond to payment incentives for quality improvements, Goldberg explained. The agency plans to use the information gathered to inform its launch of P4P for the entire industry in the near future.
But agencies in the demonstration will most likely see a kinder, gentler P4P than all agencies will see in subsequent years. That's because CMS is using only volunteers in the demo, and fewer agencies would be likely to volunteer if they would be subject to financial penalties under the project.
Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement
- ENROLLMENT:
Know The Re-Enrollment Ropes -- Or Risk All
Even a new phone number can trigger an 855 submission
Be prepared for a challenge when [...] - UROLOGY:
Do Payor-Specific Research Before Your Next S2900 Claim
Here's how to ensure your robotic-assist coding is living up to its potential
Myth: You can [...] - COVERAGE:
Study--Drug-Coated Stents Save Medicine 5.4 Percent
CMS backs off from threats to restrict off-label coverage
The drug-coated stent debate continues to rage. [...] - MEDICAL EQUIPMENT:
For Bidders, New Game May Be 'Wait And See'
Seniors' access to care could suffer if DMEPOS suppliers are few
The feds remain mum about [...] - HOME HEALTH:
Get A Sneak Peek At P4P
Demonstration project may be a sign of things to come
Even if your home health agency [...] - CPT 2008:
Tobacco Counseling, Phone E/Ms Getting Easier To Report
CPT puts time on coder's side in 2008
If figuring the level of service for telephone [...] - INDUSTRY NOTES:
A Comeback For House Calls
Plus: Now might be the time to invest in a snappy new Web site
The American [...]
