Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement
CMS' New Consult Guidelines Still Confuse Providers
Most consults are medically necessary--they just have documentation problems, says one top CMS official.
But providers won't get into trouble if they bill a consult and it turns out that the physician who requested the consult didn't have the request documented in his or her files, confirms William Rogers, director of the Physician Regulatory Issues Team at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
The requesting physician is still required to document that request, but it's not the consultant's responsibility to verify that documentation in the requester's files, says Rogers. If the requesting physician fails to document the request for a consult, he or she may not have any reimbursement at stake--but CMS will still hold him or her accountable for bad documentation, says Rogers.
"We're saying to the consultant, 'Do the consultation, that's the most important thing,'" says Rogers. "To delay a consult 24 hours on an ICU patient because you can't find the written request is difficult to support," he adds.
That still doesn't let consultants off the hook, however. A couple of problems remain.
Problem #1: CMS also wants the consulting physician to have a written document from the physician requesting the consult. But this could prove tricky, says Amanda Kunze, a coder with Wenatchee Eye & Ear Clinic in Wenatchee, WA.
Providers should either make sure there's a written referral or have a consult request form that they can fax to the requesting physician, advises Quinten Buechner, consultant with ProActive Consulting in Cumberland, WI. You can call the other office and let them know the fax is coming, so they'll be ready to fill it out and fax it back.
Buechner has a check-box form that allows the requesting physician to specify what he or she is asking for. Options include: advice and treatment, advice and management suggestions, second opinion, evaluation and treatment, opinion and recommendation of care, and recommendation for further care after evaluating the problem. There's also a space to write down the problem.
Problem #2: CMS' new consult guidelines also hint that if the consulting physician goes ahead and treats the problem which led to the consult, that's no longer considered a consult. Instead, it's a transfer of care. The medical director of Part B carrier Noridian came to Wenatchee and told Kunze and other providers that they can't bill a consult if they're also initiating treatment. A consult is only for providing an opinion back to the requesting physician.
"It's going to be really hard to determine what a consult is and what it isn't," says Kunze.
For example, CMS' new manual update on consults includes examples of correct consult billing. One of these involves an internist who sends a patient with a suspicious lesion to a dermatologist. The dermatologist decides the lesion is probably malignant and removes it, then sends the patient back to the internist with a report. "The internist resumes care of the patient and continues surveillance of the skin on the advice of the dermatologist," CMS says.
This example makes no sense, says Steven Levinson, an otolaryngologist in Fairfield CT. The internist sent the patient to the dermatologist because she wasn't competent to diagnose the suspected melanoma in the first place. It makes no sense for the dermatologist to send the patient back to the internist for continued monitoring of the melanoma. Instead, the dermatologist should keep tracking the patient's skin.
The consult policy used to distinguish between a transfer of "total care," in which a doctor takes over treating all of a patient's problems, and treatment of just one problem, adds Levinson.
If the consulting physician knows more about the patient's problem than the requesting physician, then it makes sense for the consulting physician to take care of that particular problem. If the consulting physician doesn't know more than the requesting physician, then why, Levinson asks, is the requesting physician asking for a consult in the first place?
Providers should consider having a consult request form to fax to requesting physicians--and make sure the physician turns the patient back over to the requesting doctor after the consult, say experts.
Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement
- CERTIFICATION:
New Medicare Certification Rule Weeds Out Past Variances
Prompt payment is one goal, feds say.
A rose is a rose--and now Medicare certification is [...] - PART D:
Part D Policy Shift Brings New Drugs On Board
Plans can cover prescription niacin, feds allow.
Medicare beneficiaries with high cholesterol now have a fighting [...] - PHYSICAL THERAPY:
PT Claims Not OK, Warns OIG
Medicare spends $136 million on improper claims.
Providers' physical therapy claims could be a legal nightmare [...] - CONSULTS:
CMS' New Consult Guidelines Still Confuse Providers
Providers need to make sure they have the written request in their files.
Most consults are [...] - CONSOLIDATED BILLING:
SNFs Come Up Short On Consolidated Billing Arrangements
SNFs still stuggle with unexpected 'under arrangement' bills from suppliers, agency says.
Skilled nursing facilities struggling [...] - HEALTH PLANS:
Partnerships And Premiums Propel Leading Part D Plans
Standouts dominate individual PDP and MA-PDP markets.
Only two insurers have managed to capture double-digit market [...] - COVERAGE:
Are You Ready For The Bariatric Surgery Coverage Checklist?
Only certified facilities will meet coverage criteria.
Your surgeon can obtain Medicare reimbursement for the fast-growing [...] - INDUSTRY NOTES:
The End Of September Could Be Your Cash Flow Downfall
Medicare will freeze your payments.
Brace yourself for nine lean days in late September.
The Centers for [...] - OUTPATIENT THERAPY:
Use The Right Form For Therapy Cap Communications
Confusion reigns when it come to ABNs.
If the ABN and its cousin the NEMB are [...]
