Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement
Labs Offering Favors May Violate Anti-Kickback Rules
Simply labeling test tubes on behalf of a dialysis facility could be going too far, the OIG says Sometimes it doesn't pay to be nice -- at least according to the OIG's latest advisory opinion. An anonymous contact asked the OIG to offer an opinion on whether a laboratory was breaking any rules by labeling test tubes and specimen collection containers at no cost to dialysis facilities. The OIG responded on May 9 with Advisory Opinion No. 08-06, in which Lewis Morris, chief counsel to the Inspector General, notes that the arrangement "could potentially generate prohibited remuneration under the anti-kickback statute," and indicated that the OIG could impose administrative sanctions on the lab if the arrangement were to go into effect. Although this opinion may sound extreme to some, it does lie within the legal interpretation of the anti-kickback statute, explains Tom O'Mahoney, Esq. "The statute prohibits entities from offering services to induce referrals," O'Mahoney says. "In this case, the lab has offered the labeling service, which could be construed as an attempt to get more referrals from the dialysis facility, O'Mahoney advises. "It's possible that the lab is just being nice in trying to label everyone's specimen cups so there is no confusion when they come into the lab," he says, "or, the lab might be doing something calculating to try to garner more business. There is no way of knowing without further investigation, and the OIG goes by the statute." "Everyone knows that a lab can't give cash to a facility in exchange for referrals," says Devin Ingram, Esq. "But in most cases, the OIG will view the gift or service as the same as cash -- an inducement in exchange for a service, and that's what the new advisory opinion indicates." To read the OIG's advisory opinion, visit the OIG Web site at http://www.oig.hhs.gov/fraud/docs/advisoryopinions/2008/AdvOpn08-06.pdf.
Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement
- Medicare Advantage:
CMS To Tighten Protections For Medicare Advantage
Agency proposes $25,000 penalty per enrollee for plans that violate standards The Centers for Medicare [...] - Reader Question:
Zoom In On Fluorescein Use When Treating Corneal Abrasions
Hint: Billing for a fluorescein stain is usually included as part of E/M service Question: [...] - Billing:
Medicare Offers Updated Physical Therapy Coding And Billing Rules
Personnel qualifications, policies change in Transmittal 88 If you thought CMS' therapy billing regs were [...] - Coding Coach:
Capture Urine Culture Payment With These Best Practices
If you're just assigning 87086 to every culture, you could be losing $3 per test [...] - SCHIP:
Administrator Clarifies SCHIP Policy For States
Previous message was unclear, officials say Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Acting Administrator Kerry [...] - Compliance:
Labs Offering Favors May Violate Anti-Kickback Rules
Simply labeling test tubes on behalf of a dialysis facility could be going too far, [...] - Competitive Bidding:
DME Suppliers Besiege Congress
House hearing puts CMS on the defensive as companies step up their campaign Durable medical [...] - Industry Notes:
CMS Takes Strong Stance On New Intracranial Stenting And Angioplasty Device
Plus: New DME competitive bidding program advice adds meat to Medicare's Claims Processing Manual You'll [...]
