Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement

CODING:

Are You Setting This 59-Modifier Audit Bait?

Quick test can say for sure.

Myth: If you do two bundled procedures in the same session but for different reasons, you can always use the 59 modifier to unbundle them.

Reality: You can use the 59 modifier only if the two procedures were in different sessions, were in different anatomical areas or were otherwise totally unrelated.

The recent MLN Matters Article SE0715 contained a host of examples showing when you can use the 59 modifier. For example, you should bill bone marrow biopsy code 38221 and bone marrow aspiration code 38220 using the 59 modifier only if you have two separate injection sites.

But many providers believe that they can use the 59 modifier as long as they have different diagnoses or reasons for the procedures, says Barbara Cobuzzi, president of CRN Healthcare Solutions in Tinton Falls, NJ. This is a no-no, and the HHS Office of Inspector General has warned about this sort of overuse.

For example: A patient comes in for a colectomy for colon cancer, but the patient also has a ventral incarcerated hernia that requires a complex repair using mesh. The Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) considers hernia repair code 49561 to be part of partial colectomy code 44140, because the hernia repair is integral to the closure, Cobuzzi says.

Wrong: Many providers have believed they could stick a 59 modifier on the hernia repair code and bill it separately. After all, the hernia repair may be for a totally different reason than the colectomy, such as the patient's recurrent hernia. But the 59 modifier tells the payor the hernia repair happened at a separate session, which isn't true.

Correct answer: Instead, you could try appending the 22 modifier to the colectomy code because of the extra time and effort the complex hernia repair requires. Make sure the documentation supports the additional substantial complexity of the hernia repair and mesh implantation, Cobuzzi notes. You may have to fight for the additional money, she adds.

Note: The instructions say that if another modifier defines the site of the procedure better, you should use it instead of the 59 modifier, Cobuzzi notes. For example, you should use the LT and RT modifiers to indicate the left and right sides.

For example: The physician performed a partial ethmoidectomy (31254) on the left side and a total ethmoidectomy (31255) on the right side. So you would bill those with the LT and RT modifiers respectively.

Unfortunately, many payors, including some Medicare carriers, have a hard time recognizing these modifiers. So you may end up having to use the 59 modifier after all with some payors. Similarly, Medicare is supposed to pay for multiple units of lesion removal codes, but with some carriers you may have to bill [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement

View All