Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement
New CMNs, DIFs Raise Questions Of Medical Necessity
Documentation of medical necessity remains a thorny issue for DME suppliers, and one recent procedural update doesn't offer much help.
An updated transmittal from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services reminds suppliers that new CMNs and DIFs for durable medical equipment are fast approaching, but it doesn't provide needed answers as to how much documentation is enough, say industry experts.
Many updates and changes were announced in CMS' recent transmittal on certificates of medical necessity and DME Medicare Administrative Contractor information forms. But one section left unchanged raises the most questions.
Section 5.7 still reads, "However, neither a physician's order nor a CMN nor a DIF nor a supplier prepared statement nor a physician attestation by itself provides sufficient documentation of medical necessity, even though it is signed by the treating physician or supplier."
This language doesn't sit well with some industry experts. "That statement is still contrary to the prevailing legal opinion, and [documentation of medical necessity] is a very significant ongoing issue for suppliers," attorney Seth Lundy of Fulbright & Jaworski's Washington office tells Eli.
Lundy points out that the 2005 final ruling in a case filed by Redding, CA DME supplier Maximum Comfort Inc. confirmed the CMN should constitute sufficient proof for Medicare reimbursement.
Not knowing what information or documentation will prove medical necessity puts suppliers in an uncomfortable position, says Lundy. "It's kind of like an old Supreme Court opinion on pornography--they know it
when they see it," he says.
And that's not the only problem. Some suppliers with concerns about proving medical necessity point to difficulties in getting supporting documentation from physicians. "Many physicians don't seem to understand why they have to provide more information than they originally provided in the CMN," says Sharon Hildebrandt, executive director of the Washington-based National Coalition for Assistive & Rehab Technology.
CMS has done a questionable job of updating physicians, says Hildebrandt. Putting updates on its Web site and publishing Medlearn Matters articles aren't the most effective ways to reach physicians, she points out. As a result, many suppliers must take physician education into their own hands, she says.
Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement
- REIMBURSEMENT:
MedPAC Report Pins Payment System Flaws On 'Overvalued' Services
Congress must put the brakes on health care spending, and Medicare should lead the way.
Payment [...] - PATIENT RIGHTS:
HHAs Brace For An ABN Avalanche
Reasons to give notices just multiplied.
Home health agencies will be taking on an even heavier [...] - REGULATIONS:
Fast Facts--Home Health ABNs
Insufficient notices can land providers in hot water.
Providers who don't understand the ins and outs [...] - BILLING:
New CMNs, DIFs Raise Questions Of Medical Necessity
Physician education is the key to good documentation.
Documentation of medical necessity remains a thorny issue [...] - PART D:
Pharmas Work To Cover 'Doughnut Hole' For Low-Income Benes
Coalition lacks major players--kickback issues could arise.
In an attempt to forestall potential problems with the [...] - EMERGENCY MEDICINE:
Billing New Moderate Sedation Codes Now Could Pay Off Later
Medicare is keeping watch over providers' code usage.
Medicare never paid for conscious sedation in the [...] - INDUSTRY NOTES:
Demonstration Project Offers New Outlook For Disease Management
Plus: Home health spending increase spell more bad news for HHAs.
The Centers for Medicare & [...] - FRAUD & ABUSE:
Hospice Chains Shell Out $13 Million Each In Settlements
Lawsuit, DOJ take bites out of VITAS and Odyssey earnings.
The backlash against the booming hospice [...] - COVERAGE:
The Future Looks Bright For 'Mini-Medical' Plans
Escalating health care costs push employers to consider bare-bones options.
Consumer-directed health care coverage isn't the [...]
