Internal Medicine Coding Alert

Incision and Drainage Mythbuster:

Avoid Denial Dilemmas on I&D Abscess

You'll get twice the payment when you know where to look.

Incision and drainage (I&D) services are covered for treating abscesses -- but recouping the maximum reimbursement is not as easy as you think. One wrong move could cost you as much as $80 reimbursement.

Do not let these 2 myths ruin your I&D abscess coding strategies.

Myth 1: I&D Codes Do Not Differ Significantly From Each Other

Reality: In fact, you'll discover just the opposite: these codes differ in a variety of ways.

For instance, complicated I&D code 10061 (Incision and drainage of abscess [e.g., carbuncle, suppurative hidradenitis, cutaneous or subcutaneous abscess, cyst, furuncle, or paronychia]; complicated or multiple) pays almost twice the reimbursement for superficial I&D code 10060 (... simple or single).

You'd be able to tell superficial from complicated with wounds that primarily involve the 'surface' layers of the skin -- the epidermis, dermis, or subcutaneous tissues, according to Carol Pohlig, BSN, RN, CPC, ASC, senior coding and education specialist at the University of Pennsylvania department of medicine in Philadelphia.

Example: A patient with an upper arm mass that is red, warm, and tender comes for a visit. The internist performs a level-two E/M, and decides to do I&D. She numbs the area surrounding the injury, covers the abscess with antiseptic and drapes the site. She, then, opens and drains the abscess, covering the site with a bandage, and leaving it to heal on its own with wound care.

This procedure qualifies as a simple (superficial) I&D, which you should report with the following codes:

  • 10060 for the I&D;
  • 99212 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient, which requires at least two of these three key components: a problem-focused history; a problem-focused examination; straightforward medical decision-making) for the E/M;
  • modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable E/M service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service) attached to 99212 to show that the I&D and E/M were separate services; and
  • 682.3 (Other cellulitis and abscess; upper arm and forearm) representing the abscess, and as diagnosis for 10060 and 99212.

Report 10061 If Documentation Specifies Infection

Although you may think determining when to report complicated I&D will be difficult, rest assured: it's easy. Look for these two elements: multiple incisions are required, or the abscess is complicated by the presence of an infection, says Pohlig.

You could also turn to 10061 if the I&D takes an unusual length of time to finish, is especially deep, or requires drain placement, more extensive packing, or subsequent wound closure.

Example: The internist performs I&D on a patient with an infected forearm abscess. She incises to just above the cyst cavity and drains about 10 ml of foul-smelling pus. She removes the pus, and then excises the cyst wall from the surrounding tissue using electrocautery. She irrigates the wound with saline and places a drain in the cavity, and re-approximates the skin with two interrupted 3-0 nylon mattress sutures. Finally, she applies sterile gauze after cleaning and drying the skin.

Way out: This procedure falls under complicated I&D. On the claim, you should report 10061 for the I&D, and 682.3 (Cellulitis abscess upper arm forearm) linked to 10061 to represent the patient's cyst.

Payoff: You must know how to differentiate between the two I&D codes, or else you risk losing out on your reimbursement. Based on 2010 RVUs -- 2.81 for 10060 and 4.77 for 10061 -- the difference in payment is significantly high. Using the conversion factor of $36.8729, 10060 should pay about $88.86, while 10061 about $156.34.

Myth 2: Use I&D Codes Whenever Abscess Is Present

Reality: The presence of an abscess or cyst does not always require a surgical incision and drainage service. When pus is present in an abscess or cyst without a drainage outlet, then it is medically necessary to perform an incision and drainage.

Caution: You are likely to get denied on your claims for I&D services if the internist performs the procedure for drainage of a blister, particularly if the blister is small, uninfected, superficial and uncomplicated, according to healthcare reimbursement site AccuChecker.

Remember: Your physician's notes will need to support the complexity of the procedure, reminds Elizabeth McDonald, CPC, coding specialist in the department of surgery at UPMC-Pittsburgh. If blisters, cyst (including sebaceous cyst), cellulitis or other fluid collections and infections do not have documented presence of discrete abscess or pus collection, forget about reporting 10060-10061.

Note: When you code these procedures in conjunction with an initial hospital visit or a subsequent visit, for example, make sure you append modifier 25 to the E/M to point out that you are seeing the patient for multiple ongoing conditions.

Other Articles in this issue of

Internal Medicine Coding Alert

View All

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.