CMS also discusses new OASIS form, PPS rate cuts, and more at industry conference.
Expect medical review scrutiny in some new areas, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services revealed at a recent industry conference. Current problems Medicare medical reviewers are finding include old standbys, with homebound documentation first and foremost. About 43 percent of home health claim denials are for homebound reasons, noted CMS's Latesha Walker at the National Association for Home Care & Hospice's March on Washington conference March 26. Other problems are medical necessity; failure to have a plan of care or physician signature for the POC; and a lack of documentation to support the services billed (for example, therapy visit frequency missing from the POC), Walker said. But medical reviewers will be focusing on two new areas, Walker said. They will examine episodes that barely exceed the low utilization payment adjustment (LUPA) threshold of five visits. They'll determine whether documentation doesn't support the visits that push the episode out of a LUPA. And medical reviewers will look at situations where an agency billed a low HHRG code for a first episode, but a higher one later. Other issues CMS covered in its sessions at the NAHC conference include: The revisions are centered about the switch to ICD-10 coding, Sevast noted. While CMS has announced a delay to the implementation of ICD-10, "we are proceeding as if ICD-10 is going to be implemented Oct. 1, 2013," she said. That's because CMS's delay for the new coding set won't be official until it finishes rulemaking. Observers expect to see an even steeper case mix creep cut in this year's PPS rules, they say. CMS also will continue to address PPS issues that incentivize growth, Chu said. In addition, CMS is moving forward on its PPS rebasing project. The agency is using outside contractors including L&M Policy Research, Ava-lere, and Mathematica to analyze potential changes and impacts, Chu told attendees. But in the presentation, CMS indicated that the 13th and 19th visits also wouldn't be billable. NAHC will seek clarification on this issue, NAHC's Mary St. Pierre told conference attendees. CMS is on track to implement value-based purchasing in the 2014 to 2017 timeframe as planned, CMS's Kelly Horney said in the session. You can expect National Quality Forum-endorsed outcome measures to make up the criteria for P4P, if CMS's new report is any indication. You can see the 73-page report at www.cms.gov/Home HealthPPS/Downloads/Stage-2-NPRM.pdf. Observers also expect CMS to include components of the P4P demo that ran in 2007 and 2008. CMS has posted its first OASIS C training module, which addresses medication items, at www.cms.gov/OASIS/10_Training.asp. It will post additional sessions shortly on care planning and interventions; neuro/emotional/behavioral status items; and integumentary/pressure ulcer items, Sevast said. CMS also plans to develop a module on activities of daily living and IADLs later.
But what happens if agencies miss the 13- and 19-visit assessment? The PPS final rule for last year and manual guidance indicate that agencies can bill for the 13th or 19th visit, then resume billing the visit after the assessment visit (see Eli's HCW, Vol. XX, No. 16, p. 122). So if the reassessment visit is the 14th one, billing may resume for the 15th visit.