Home Health & Hospice Week

Advisory commission forges ahead despite industry's concerns. More than your reputation may soon ride on your quality measures - cold hard cash could be on the line.

The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission wants to tie home health agency payments to quality measures in the near future, the influential advisory body to Congress indicated in its Sept. 9 meeting.

Despite industry reservations, MedPAC appears likely to recommend some sort of tie between payment and quality for HHAs. The main question is what quality indicators MedPAC will use.

Currently MedPAC is considering two data sets Medicare already uses - outcome-based quality improvement (OBQI) measures, 10 of which are already publicly displayed on Home Health Compare Web site, and outcome-based quality monitoring (OBQM) measures.

MedPAC also is looking at process-oriented measures suggested by Pfizer Inc. and Rand Corp.'s Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE) project and as-yet-undetermined patient satisfaction surveys.

You can't argue with rewarding providers for performance, says Bob Wardwell with the Visiting Nurse Associations of America. But he has advised MedPAC that the home health sector isn't "quite ready" for the financial tie to quality.

MedPAC most likely will end up recommending payment differences based on quality measures Medicare already uses. But there are lots of problems with those OASIS-based measures, notes consultant Pam Warmack with Clinic Connections in Ruston, LA.

Chief amongst those problems is the risk adjuster, MedPAC Commissioner Carol Raphael said in the meeting. The adjuster doesn't fully compensate for outcome differences in different types of patients, argued Raphael, CEO of the Visiting Nurse System of New York.

For example, HHAs treating psychiatric patients have a large number of patients who are confused, Warmack says. And by the nature of their condition, those psych patients "will have very little chance of experiencing a decrease in the degree of confusion or the frequency of the confusion," she complains.

The same goes for chronic care patients who have little chance of improving their functional outcomes, Raphael pointed out in the meeting.

Warmack fears HHAs would shun patient populations known to drag down outcomes if the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ties reimbursement to quality measures.

Another problem is that clinicians continue to inaccurately fill out OASIS, which is the basis of the OBQI and OBQM measures, Warmack notes.

Studies have shown inter-rater reliability (agreement between different clinicians filling out an assessment) to be between 60 and 80 percent, and congruence (agreement with oneself) to be around 60 percent, a MedPAC staffer said. In the quality measure world, those are considered good figures, she claimed.

CMS' ongoing tweaking of the OASIS tool adds to the confusion, MedPAC acknowledged.

Often the variables affecting patient outcomes are beyond an agency's control, Raphael noted. In addition to patient characteristics, one example is rehospitalization. A study VNS-NY conducted [...]