Home Health & Hospice Week

Prospective Payment System:

Count Your Episodes Using New M0110 Rules

CMS answers a nagging question about sequencing denied episodes.

One M0110 mystery is solved, but the solution may not make your PPS billing much easier.

"Any Medicare fee-for-service covered episode for a beneficiary is considered in determining adjacent covered episodes," the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services says in May 16 Transmittal No. 1505 (CR 6027).

The keyword is "covered," experts point out. Episodes that Medicare denies don't count toward "later" episode designations.

Background: Under the prospective payment system refinements that took place Jan. 1, Medicare pays more for a later (third or later) episode than an early (first or second) episode.

"The Common Working File [will] exclude episodes that were fully denied by medical review from determinations of whether an episode should be paid as 'early' or 'later,'" the transmittal explains.

Good: "This memo will help correct some of the M0110 errors that have been occurring since the beginning of the year," cheers consultant Judy Adams with LarsonAllen in Charlotte, NC. "No longer counting a denied episode ... for calculating the sequence will stop errors by the intermediaries."

Before this clarification, home health agencies were unsure whether to count denied episodes or not. One HHA asked regional home health intermediary Cahaba GBA the same question earlier this year and the RHHI said it didn't know either (see Eli's HCW, Vol. XVII, No. 11).

Not so good: This clarification will make checking the Common Working File for previous episodes even more confusing, predicts consultant M. Aaron Little with BKD in Springfield, MO. Currently, any episode listed in the CWF counts toward M0110. The CWF doesn't distinguish between paid or denied episodes. But under the clarification, denied episodes will show up in the CWF but won't count toward M0110.

How it will work: Denied episodes will have a "2" indicator when they're fully denied under medical review. Otherwise episodes will have a "0" indicator, CMS says. That indicator will show up in the RAP cancellation field of the CWF, a CMS official tells Eli.

HHAs will have to know enough to recognize a denied episode and realize it doesn't count toward the episode sequence, Little points out. "It will certainly take some educating to get people used to understanding what the indicator means," he says.  "I wouldn't say it's currently intuitive."

Not understanding the new indicator may lead to inaccurate billing, experts fear.

Looming: Billers already have their hands full with adjustments under PPS refinements. Adjust-ments for episode sequence and therapy visit numbers can entirely change which of the four equations an episode falls into, and thus its reimbursement level.

Often, medical reviewers won't deny claims for episodes until subsequent episodes already have been billed, Adams expects. This will mean an agency may bill a later episode based on CWF information that's current at [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more