Home Health & Hospice Week

Medical Review:

INTERMEDIARY TAKES AIM AT LONG-STAY HOSPICE CLAIMS

Reviewers deny 70% of reviewed claims for prognosis, other problems.

You'd better make sure your documentation of long-stay patients' terminal illness is pristine or face major claims denials.

Medical reviewers at regional home health intermediary Cahaba GBA denied about 70 percent of claims in two recent hospice reviews, mainly for problems with the six-month prognosis. And more scrutiny is on the way--a lot more.

The first review looked at claims for patients with a primary diagnosis of 414.00 (Coronary atherosclerosis of unspecified type of vessel, native or graft) and stays longer than 180 days. The second review examined claims for patients with revenue code 0651 (routine home care) and stays longer than 730 days.

In the diagnosis code probe, reviewers denied a whopping 87 percent of claims due to "the six-month terminal prognosis not being supported," Cahaba says in its April newsletter to providers. In the revenue code probe, reviewers shot down 71 percent of claims for that reason.

"Documentation is essential in 'painting the picture,' especially for patients that have remained on the hospice benefit for an extended length of time, or the patients that have chronic illnesses or general decline," Cahaba tells providers. "These diagnoses alone may not support a six-month or less life expectancy, and documentation is depended upon to show why the patient is hospice appropriate."

Warning: Don't slack off on documentation as time goes by. "The patient's appropriateness for the hospice benefit must be clearly supported in the medical record from admission and throughout the hospice care provided," Cahaba directs.

Hospices are getting some sympathy from lawmakers on the difficulties of determining a six-month prognosis. Lawmakers in March introduced legislation that would place a three-year moratorium on retroactive repayments from hospice providers to Medicare and authorize a study of the hospice benefit, according to press reports.

A recent Medicare Payment Advisory Commission analysis projected that 220 hospices, or about one in every 13 providers, in 2005 received repayment demands totaling $166 million, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

But MedPAC isn't likely to be hospices' friend this legislative session. The Commission has expressed its desire to freeze or cut hospice payments with a "blunt instrument," according to a recent meeting (see Eli's HCW, Vol. XVII, No. 11). Get Ready For More Review Documenting terminal illness in clinical notes isn't hospices' only problem. Reviewers for the Cahaba revenue code probe also denied 13 percent of claims for "missing, incomplete or untimely certification," the intermediary says in the April Newsline.

Reviewers denied another 10 percent of claims in that probe for missing or incomplete election statements. The election statement must include your hospice's identification; the patient's acknowledgement of an explanation of the benefit; the effective date of the election and the patient's signature, Cahaba reminds providers.

In the [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more