Home Health & Hospice Week

Industry Notes:

Say GoodBye To SOI

Good riddance, association says.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has sent your statements of intent the way of the dinosaur after concluding that the procedure, which was originally set up to allow beneficiaries more time to file claims, is apparently of little use to its intended target.

According to a final rule in the April 23 Federal Register, 98 percent of claims currently filed are done on assignment, as opposed to 52 percent almost 30 years ago. Additionally, of the vast number of SOI claim requests submitted, only 4.4 percent are actually processed and paid.

"The SOI process is a resource burden on Medicare contractors, providers and suppliers with little return or benefit to the states," the rule reads.

CMS says it hopes the change will encourage states to pursue cost-avoidance procedures and reduce processing expenses -- while having little financial impact on providers and suppliers since the 15- to 27-month claim submission period remains unchanged.

"Over the years, home health agencies have been deluged with tens of thousands of 'demand bills' initiated by state Medicaid programs after those programs had extended a filing period using the SOI procedures," notes the National Association for Home Care & Hospice in its newsletter to members. "Therefore, all things considered, the SOI procedures had become a burden to home health agencies."

  • Hospital-based HHAs now will be granted the same privilege as freestanding agencies in regards to supplies costs. After a billing glitch caused many agencies to strip supplies charges from their claims, CMS allowed them to add those costs back into their cost reports without having to reprocess the claims (see Eli's HCW, Vol. XIII, No. 2).

    CMS instructed regional home health intermediaries not to adjust the cost report supplies data down to PS&R levels, but failed to tell Part A intermediaries that process hospital-based agencies' claims the same thing. In an April 23 One-Time Notice (Transmittal No. 75), CMS corrects the oversight.

  • Home care mergers and acquisitions are down this quarter compared to the same time last year, according to New Canaan, CT-based Irving Levin Associates Inc. Publicly disclosed home health deals were pegged at six for the first quarter of 2004, compared with 14 transactions in the first quarter of 2003. But activity picked up from the mere three deals reported in the last quarter of 2003.

  • Long-term care giant Manor Care Inc. saw its HHA and hospice revenues increase 26 percent to $92 million in the quarter ended March 31, compared to the prior year's quarter. The Toledo, OH-based company's hospice census exceeded 4,500 patients for the first time during the quarter, it said.

    Overall, Manor Care reported $41.1 million in net income on $797 million in revenues for the quarter.

  • Medicare cuts to respiratory drugs combined with the termination of its managed care contract with Gentiva Health Services cost Apria Healthcare Group Inc. $9 million in revenues in the latest quarter.  The Lake Forest, CA-based oxygen and home medical equipment company reported net income of $27.8 million on $350.9 million in revenues for the quarter ended March 31, compared with a $27.8 million profit on $335.1 million in revenues for the same period in 2003.

    Despite the flat profitability figures, Apria is full steam ahead on acquiring new businesses and growing its oxygen business line. The company bought seven businesses for about $42 million during the quarter, mostly in the Southwest and Texas. But the purchases did include diabetic supplier Star Medical Rx in Kansas City. "Our acquisitions pipeline is full and we now expect that we will exceed our target of $100 million in acquisitions this year," Apria says.

    "We are increasing our efforts to expand our respiratory business," the company adds.

  • Heads have rolled at Matria Healthcare Inc., thanks to sagging profits. The Marietta, GA-based disease management company says its obstetrical home care and maternity DM service line underperformed, and thus it has reduced staff, consolidated locations and reduced discretionary expenses related to the business.

    Matria reported net income of $0.9 million on revenues of $88.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, compared to a $1.1 million profit on $78.2 million in revenues for the same period in 2003.

  • Lincare Holdings Inc. CEO John P. Byrnes has entered into a pre-arranged trading plan to sell 765,000 shares in the company over 17 months, the company says. Byrnes will be exercising stock options that expire through December 2005, Lincare explains.

  • The appointment of a turnaround specialist as CEO in the Intrepid USA bankruptcy case may indicate a resolution is drawing closer. Intrepid and its financier, DVI Inc., have been fighting for control of the Edina, MN-based chain with nearly 200 locations (see Eli's HCW, Vol. XIII, No. 6).

    Dennis Simon, managing principle of financial restructuring consultant Crossroads, became Intrepid CEO and president in March, says an April 26 press release from Intrepid. The company's Todd Garamella became the board chairman, Intrepid says in a release.

    Intrepid has secured approved debtor-in-possession financing from CapitalSource Finance. The loan will be to the tune of $25 million, reports The Daily Deal.

  • A decision on Coram Healthcare Corp.'s bankruptcy reorganization plan may finally come in June, reports the Deal. Confirmation hearings wrapped up April 20, but parties in the case have until late May to file post-hearing petitions.

    The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware already has denied several reorganization plans for the Denver-based company that filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy in August 2000. Creditors and pre-petition shareholders continue to fight over control of the company, the Deal notes.

  • Accounting giant Ernst & Young has been barred from accepting new corporate clients for the next six months, the Associated Press reports.

    An administrative law judge at the Securities & Exchange Commission handed down this ruling as part of Ernst & Young's punishment for inappropriately auditing a client's books while at the same time helping the company market and develop a new software product. The accounting firm also must pay $1.7 million in restitution, AP says.