Regular payroll checks not so good for liquidating prior year's costs. A Louisiana home health agency is out about $14,000 in compensation reimbursement, plus the cost and headache of an appeal.
The Department of Health and Human Services Administrator overturned a Jan. 7 Provider Reimbursement Review Board decision favoring Metairie, LA-based Family Home Care Inc. (see Eli's HCW, Vol. XIV, No. 5).
The PRRB had said liquidating 1998 compensation to Family Home Care's owners through regular payroll checks issued at the beginning of 1999 was fine. But HHS recently reversed the PRRB's ruling.
"We are really disappointed," Elaine Bergeron, director and co-owner of the HHA, tells Eli.
Family Home Care failed to meet its burden of proof that it was paying for costs accrued in 1998 versus 1999 with the 1999 payroll checks, HHS says.
The HHA has no plans to appeal the decision in federal court, Bergeron says. "This is enough already."
The influential advisory body also plans to look at post-hospital versus non-post-hospital patients and patients with characteristics such as marked frailty, caregivers and cognitive problems.
The SpectraCare operation will be integrated into Priority's existing Integrity Healthcare Services specialty infusion business, which has 29 branches in 18 states, reports Priority President and CEO Steve Cosler.
Dynamic's new branches are in Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Washington and Wyoming.
An upcoming audit will determine the exact amount of the settlement, which the AG expects to be around $3 million. Special Touch's attorney puts the figure at closer to $1 million, according to the New York Daily News. The agency believed it was paying aides properly, it says.
"While we recognize home health care agencies face some difficulty interpreting the complicated federal and state wage and hour laws applicable in this industry, home health care aides must be provided the overtime premium that is afforded to them under state law," Spitzer says in a release.
Austin and his wife, Annette, founded Health Care Options with offices in Baton Rouge and Lafay-ette. But as part of Howard Austin's guilty plea, charges against his wife were dropped, the paper says.
A federal grand jury indicted the couple in November 2003 when prosecutors accused them of diverting $2 million from an employee pension plan and billing Medicare for personal purchases from 1996 to 2000. The personal purchases included lawn care, pool services and resort travel, the Advocate says.
During the sentencing, federal judge Frank Polozola voiced suspicions that the Austins parked their assets in Health Care Options with its new owner, who is a close family friend, to avoid paying restitution. Annette Austin already has repurchased her shares in the agency, the paper reports.