Home Health & Hospice Week
Messing With Docs' Numbers Brings DME Supplier Prison Time
Providers and billing companies should take pains to recognize the sanctity of physicians' billing numbers, or face steep penalties. The turning point in the campaign against health care fraud and abuse - the August 1996 effective date of the anti-fraud provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act - has taken on a uniquely personal significance for a durable medical equipment supplier convicted of health care fraud. Joyce Lee Hickman was sentenced to more than 17 years in prison for billing Medicare and other insurers for DME that was never prescribed and inpatient doctor visits and other services that never actually happened. She was also ordered to pay more than $9 million in restitution on the bogus claims, which were submitted between 1995 and 2001. Hickman's company, Total Medical Management, included a billing service for physicians, a DME supply company and a medical and dental clinic. On appeal, Hickman successfully argued that three of the 32 counts on which she was convicted involved claims submitted before the anti-fraud provisions of HIPAA were in effect - and thus violated the Ex Post Facto Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits the after-the-fact imposition of punishments for behavior that wasn't a crime, or had more modest penalties, at the time it was performed. "Although Hickman's actions prior to the creation of the health care fraud statute were indefensible, unconscionable, and undoubtedly criminal, we conclude that it is unfair ... to hold her accountable for restitution for Ex Post Facto convictions," the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in U.S. v. Hickman (No. 02-20174). The bad news for Hickman: While the appellate panel ordered the trial court to resentence her, its opinion suggests the restitution amount - not the hefty jail term - was the element of the sentence that didn't pass constitutional muster. In originally slapping Hickman with her whopping sentence, the trial court explicitly noted that doctors had been victimized by her when she meddled with their billing numbers without their knowledge. Editor's Note: The opinion is at www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/OpinHome.cfm.
Home Health & Hospice Week
- Reimbursement:
CMS Waits To Pounce On $250 Million In PEP Recoupments
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services still plans to reach into your pocket for [...] - Billing:
Brace For PEP Takebacks With These 3 Steps
Even with an extended recovery period, home health agencies are likely to see a heavy [...] - Diagnosis Coding:
HIPAA Enforcement Will Include V Codes
If you haven't set your training schedule for V and E diagnosis codes yet, now [...] - Billing:
Wheel Out Those Denied Wheelchair Claims Again
There's good reimbursement news for DME suppliers that have seen claims denials for manual wheelchairs [...] - Regulations:
Other Open Door Forum Highlights
Other topics covered in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' June 4 Open Door [...] - Referrals:
Hospital Stats Could Change Your Referral Stream
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is pushing ahead with plans to publish hospitals' [...] - Fraud & Abuse:
Messing With Docs' Numbers Brings DME Supplier Prison Time
Providers and billing companies should take pains to recognize the sanctity of physicians' billing numbers, [...] - Industry Notes:
Hold Off On HIPAA Agreements With Intermediaries, Carriers
You might not have as many Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act business associate agreements [...]
