You have an extra few years, but you'll still be hard pressed to achieve compliance. The The delay from the proposed 2011 deadline "is a victory for medicine," says the "This delay is a victory for providers, payers, and coders," says the The Not everyone is happy with the change, though. The Get going: The year 2013 may seem far away, but billing and coding expert "Contact your software vendors to find out when updates will be available," he says. "Contact your insurance companies to find out when they will be ready so there's little interruption with the claims and payment process. Seek assistance from the coding and billing associations. We have work to do to get ready." NAHC urges CMS to begin educating providers on the new system right away. Delay unlikely: Get Ready For 155,000 Codes ICD-9-CM contains only 17,000 codes; Volume 3 (which contains the hospital inpatient procedure codes) has been running out of space for several years, resulting in placing procedure codes outside the clinical hierarchy where they belong. ICD-10, by contrast, contains more than 155,000 codes and can accommodate a host of new diagnoses and procedures. The additional codes will also help facilitate the implementation of electronic health records. The expanded diagnoses shouldn't scare coders and providers away, but they should be wary of a few things. "A trained coder will not have any problem with the transition," Verno says. "The main issue we will face will be with provider documentation. Under ICD-9 we could use many unspecified codes, but not under ICD-10. The documentation must be more thorough and complete." CMS says adoption of ICD-10 is expected to: • More accurately define services and provide specific diagnosis and treatment information; • Provide the precision necessary for a number of emerging uses such as pay-for-performanceand biosurveillance (monitoring information to help detect an emerging epidemic); • Support comprehensive reporting of data; • Ensure more accurate payments for new procedures, decrease the number of rejected claims, facilitate improved disease management, and coordinate disease monitoring and reporting worldwide; and • Allow the U.S. to compare its data with international data to track the incidence and spread of disease and treatment outcomes.