Tip: Scrutinize your analysis, then put a course of action in place. The issues that tripped up University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MD Anderson) are easily avoidable. Organizations must use the information gleaned from their risk assessments to fully implement and manage a working HIPAA system, especially with more and more encryption issues like this coming down the pike. “The recent ruling by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) against MD Anderson provides insight into several areas of HIPAA compliance and the government’s enforcement thereof,” explains attorney John E. Morrone, Esq., a partner at Frier Levitt Attorneys at Law in New York. Review Morrone’s eight takeaways from the ALJ decision: Reminder: An assessment reviews how a breach would “negatively impact” your ePHI, suggests the OCR in its Q-and-A on the difference between risk analysis and risk management. When you analyze, you “consider all relevant losses that would be expected if the security measures were not in place,” the agency guidance notes. Management of that risk involves the way your practice implements HIPAA controls from the gathered data and emerging threats. Read the OCR Q-and-A at www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/faq/2013/what-is-the-difference-between-risk-analysis-and risk-management-in-the-security-rule/index.html.