Does your docs’ F2F documentation include an explanation of clinical findings?
Medical reviewers are poring over your claims — even for second and later episodes — with a focus on face-to-face encounter documentation from the physician. Here’s what will bring you denials. Home Health & Hospice Medicare Administrative Contractor Palmetto GBA has begun a “more comprehensive review” regarding F2F issues, MAC CGS has announced a new widespread probe with F2F as the topic, and NHIC will be checking for F2F documentation for all home health claims it reviews.
In a message to providers, CGS notes the F2F documentation must:
Sidestep These F2F Landmines
Many commonly used phrases in F2F documentation will not pass medical review, CGS warns.
For homebound: Using the phrases “functional decline, dementia, confusion, difficult to travel to doctor’s office, unable to leave home, weak and unable to drive” will not support the patient’s homebound status — or your claim, CGS says.
Listing just a diagnosis like osteoarthritis, procedure like total knee replacement, injury such as hip fracture, or conditions like gait abnormality or weakness won’t support the homebound determination, Palmetto adds. The doc must list specific clinical findings explaining why those things cause the homebound condition.
For medical necessity: Including the language “Family is asking for help, continues to have problems, patient unable to do wound care, or diabetes,” and including a list of tasks for the nurse to do will not support the need for skilled services, CGS adds.