Advanced Search

General Surgery Coding Alert

You Be the Coder:

44204-44208: Count Procedure(s), Not Bowel Section(s)

Published on Wed Nov 17, 2010

Question: The surgeon laparoscopically identified a segment of the small bowel that appeared necrotic extending from just distal to the cecum back to the jejunoileal junction. He chose a proximal resection margin well away from the necrotic tissue and opened an avascular window in the mesentery and continued the dissection to the mid ascending colon. The surgeon submitted both small bowel and cecum sections for pathology. Should I code two bowel resections since the surgeon submitted both small bowel and cecum sections for pathology? Answer: No, you should not report two bowel resections based on this op note. Although the note mentions submitting both small bowel and cecum sections for pathology, it appears that the surgeon performed just one bowel excision, not two separate excisions of a piece of small bowel and a piece of colon. You don't provide the entire op note, but if the closure was an ileocolostomy, [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

General Surgery Coding Alert

View All