Question: Recently, our surgeon placed a PEG tube during the same session that a gastroenterologist performed an EGD. Should we bill 43246 with modifier 62, or should we report 43750 for our portion and let the gastroenterologist report 43235 separately for his portion? --Technical and coding advice for You Be the Coder and Reader Questions provided by Marcella Bucknam, CPC, CCS, CPC-H, CCS-P, HIM program coordinator at Clarkson College in Omaha, Neb.
Virginia Subscriber
Answer: You-re probably more correct to report 43246 (Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy including esophagus, stomach, and either the duodenum and/or jejunum as appropriate; with directed placement of percutaneous gastrostomy tube) with modifier 62 (Two surgeons).
In this case, each physician performed a distinct component of a single procedure. Therefore, separately reporting 43750 (Percutaneous placement of gastrostomy tube) for the surgeon and 43235 (Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy including esophagus, stomach, and either the duodenum and/or jejunum as appropriate; diagnostic, with or without collection of specimen[s] by brushing or washing [separate procedure]) for the GI doctor would probably constitute unbundling, according to most payers.
For a co-surgery claim to work, however, the two physicians must coordinate their billing strategies. This requires three steps:
1. Because co-surgeons each perform a distinct part of the procedure, they can't share the same documentation. Each physician should provide a note detailing what portion of the procedure he performed, how much work was involved, and how long the procedure took.
2. Each physician should identify the other as a co-surgeon.
3. The co-surgeons should link the same diagnosis to the common procedure code.