General Surgery Coding Alert

Reader Questions:

Separate Diagnoses Don't Guarantee Modifier 59

Question: One of the coders in our department insists that we can use modifier 59 if the surgeon performs a "separate procedure" for a diagnosis different from the diagnosis that prompted the primary procedure. In looking over Medicare and CPT guidelines, however, I see nothing to support this. Is a separate diagnosis enough to warrant modifier 59? Maine Subscriber Answer: According to CPT instructions and Chapter 1 of the national Correct Coding Initiative (CCI), you may append modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service) when the physician: - sees a patient during a different session - treats a different site or organ system - makes a separate incision/excision - tends to a different lesion - treats a separate injury. Although the diagnosis that prompts the follow-up procedure with modifier 59 may be different from the diagnosis that prompted the primary procedure, a different diagnosis by itself does not justify using modifier 59. [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more