General Surgery Coding Alert

READER QUESTIONS:

Check for Separate Capsulectomy

Question: When our surgeon performs second stage breast reconstructions, he often performs a capsulectomy as well. Should we consider these different procedures, even though they're at the same site through the same incision? Can we code both using 11970 and 11971-59? Texas Subscriber Answer: No, you should not consider these separate procedures. The situation you describe does not meet the standard for separate billing. The Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) edits bundle 11970 (Replacement of tissue expander with permanent prosthesis) and 11971 (Removal of tissue expander[s] without insertion of prosthesis) as a mutually exclusive pair. Although the CCI modifier indicator allows you to unbundle the pair, when appropriate, your situation does not meet the criteria of separate body site or operative session to warrant overriding the edit pair using modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service). If the capsulectomy is extensive enough to truly involve significant additional time or work, you should document [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

General Surgery Coding Alert

View All