Question: A provider conducted a fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy on both breasts using ultrasound guidance (US). The surgical report provides an in-depth description of the procedure performed on the right breast, but only mentions that “a comparable procedure was carried out on the left breast.” Is this enough documentation to support a bilateral procedure? If so, how should I report the codes? AAPC Forum Participant Answer: It’s not uncommon for a report on a US-guided FNA biopsy to use this type of language, suggesting that the surgeon carried out the same procedure on the opposite side. While the documentation you’ve mentioned isn’t perfect, it shouldn’t require an additional note for you to code the procedure as bilateral. You might consider advising your provider that, for optimal dictation practices, especially for protection against malpractice claims, it’s crucial to include specific details for each side.
As for the procedure coding, remember that 10005 (Fine needle aspiration biopsy, including ultrasound guidance; first lesion) has a medically unlikely edit (MUE) of 1. This means that you may report only one unit of 10005 on any given date of service (DOS). Reporting 10005 separately with modifiers LT (Left side) and RT (Right side) is inappropriate, and the payer will deny the service. Consider the following CPT® Assistant guidelines: Based on these instructions, you should report 10005 with modifier RT for the first lesion of the right breast and 10006 (… each additional lesion (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure)) with modifier LT for the second lesion of the left breast.