General Surgery Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Scar Revision Coding Depends on Documentation

Question: The surgeon performed a bilateral mastectomy on a patient and has scheduled her for a revision of bilateral chest-wall scars. How can I code this? New York Subscriber Answer: More information is necessary (what kind of revision was done, how deep, was there a prosthetic, etc.) to provide a definitive answer, but there are a number of possible scenarios, depending on the circumstances:

1. 13100-13102 (Repair, complex, trunk ...): Scar revisions that primarily involve the skin and subcutaneous tissue often involve complex repairs. The code includes the scars excision. Choose the appropriate code depending on how large the scar was. 2. 14000-14001 (Adjacent tissue transfer or rearrangement, trunk ...):Adjacent tissue transfers (e.g., advancement flaps) are another common method of scar revision. As with complex repairs, scar excision is included.

3. 19371 (Periprosthetic capsulectomy, breast): This code specifically describes excision of scar tissue that has formed around a prosthetic. If the surgeon implanted a prosthetic, you should report the revision with this code. If the surgeon simply lysed a scar that formed around a prosthetic (i.e., there was no excision), report 19370 (Open periprosthetic capsulotomy, breast). 4. 19260 (Excision of chest-wall tumor including ribs): This code describes excision of a tumor of the chest wall and is the best choice if there was new tumor growth and not just excision of scar tissue. 5. 21899 (Unlisted procedure, neck or thorax): If scar revision included more than just the skin and subcutaneous tissue, the musculoskeletal system codes are a good choice. Unfortunately, CPT does not contain a specific code to describe such a procedure, leaving the unlisted-procedure code as the only choice. This is a "last-resort" code, and you must support it with ample documentation to explain fully the nature of the procedure and the work involved.

There are other possible coding solutions, including various grafts and flaps. This stresses the importance of careful documentation and physician/coder communication. In this case, if the documentation the physician provided is no more precise than the questions information, you should confer with the operating surgeon to determine the best code selection.  
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

General Surgery Coding Alert

View All