General Surgery Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Modifier -26 and FNA Codes

Question: Why are our claims for fine needle aspiration (FNA) performed in the office being denied? Ohio Subscriber Answer: FNA is reported using 10021 or 10022. These codes were introduced in CPT 2002 to replace 88170 and 88171. However, 10021 and 10022 retained the characteristics of the two earlier codes: This includes the fact that each could be divided into professional and technical components, despite the fact that the technical component only covered provision of supplies (i.e., slide and needle) for the service. Medicare issued a transmittal (AB-02-018) in February 2002 that ended this division. Modifiers -26 (Professional component) and -TC (Technical component) no longer apply to 10021 and 10022 and should not be appended, even if the procedure was performed in the hospital and the surgeon did not pay for the supplies. It may be that the carrier is denying FNA because a modifier has been appended inappropriately. Otherwise, the claims should not be rejected (assuming they are documented appropriately), and any denials should be appealed.  
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

General Surgery Coding Alert

View All

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.