General Surgery Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Dual Diagnosis Presents Incident-To Options

Question: A physician assistant (PA) or a nurse practitioner (NP) is treating a patient incident-to a physician who earlier saw the patient for a catheter insertion. If, during the PAs interaction with the patient, the PA makes an additional diagnosis (urinary tract infection), does the physician need to see the patient again to substantiate the new diagnosis? Could we bill the earlier service as incident-to? Mississippi Subscriber Answer: This type of situation is why PAs and NPs should have their own Medicare provider identification number (PIN). If they have their own Medicare PINs, you have two options in this case. If billing incident-to, the physician would have to see the patient again to substantiate the nonphysician practitioners (NPPs) urinary tract infection diagnosis. Make sure the record demonstrates that the physician did this. Because this is incident-to, you would be billing under the physicians Medicare number. The other option is to have the NPP perform a urinalysis and bill the service under his own Medicare number. In this case the service would not be incident-to and the surgeon would not need to be further involved.  
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

General Surgery Coding Alert

View All