General Surgery Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Avoid 62 with Unlisted Procedure

Question: How should we bill for a laparoscopic excision and closure of a colovesical fistula with two surgeons? Our surgeon performed the bladder side of the procedure, excising bladder tissue due to localized necrosis, followed by two-layer closure. Our surgeon then instilled saline to check for evidence of leaks. Codify Subscriber Answer: Because there is not code for doing this procedure laparoscopically, you should report the service as 44238 (Unlisted laparoscopy procedure, intestine [except rectum]). Although you indicate that the procedure involved two surgeons, you should not try to use modifier 62 (Two surgeons), because most payers don’t want pricing modifiers such as 62 on unlisted procedure codes. Do this: Because you need to indicate the price for an unlisted code, you should price the procedure as though you used modifier 62. That means setting the value at 125 percent of 44661 (Closure of enterovesical fistula; with intestine and/or bladder [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

General Surgery Coding Alert

View All