General Surgery Coding Alert

Heads-Up:

Tissue Transfers Still Include Lesion Excisions

NCCI bundles remain in effect

If you had hoped you could report lesion excisions (11400-11646) separately with adjacent tissue transfers (14000-14350), be ready for disappointment. Unless the two procedures occur at distinct anatomical areas or during different sessions, you won't be able to receive separate payment for the lesion excision.

Background: The June 2006 General Surgery Coding Alert (page 44) reported: -NCCI 12.1 deletes one set of formerly troublesome edits. Starting in April, lesion excision codes 11600-11646 will no longer be components of tissue transfer or rearrangement codes 14000-14300.-

The update: The latest version (12.2) of the National Correct Coding Initiative again lists lesion excisions 11400-11646 as bundled to (included in) all tissue transfer codes in the 14000-14350 range.

And introductory text in NCCI's Chapter 3 (Surgery: Integumentary System) specifies, -Excision CPT codes (11400-11646) - are not to be separately reported when CPT codes 14000-14350 are reported.- These instructions mimic similar (although less clearly stated) guidelines set forth in the CPT manual. Separate Surgeons Won't Mean Separate Payment Continued bundling of 11400-11646 to 14000-14350 is bad news for general surgeons and plastic surgeons who work together, with the general surgeon performing the lesion excision and the plastic surgeon providing the adjacent tissue transfer.

Here's the problem: The physician fee schedule database indicates that you may not report co-surgeons using modifier 62 (Two surgeons)--or assistant surgeons using modifiers 80, 82 or AS--for adjacent tissue transfers 14000-14350, says Terri Brame, CPC, CPC-H, operations manager for the Division of Clinical Revenue at the University of Washington Department of Surgery.

Therefore, if a general surgeon removes a lesion and a plastic surgeon performs the adjacent tissue transfer later in the same session, you cannot list the surgeons as co-surgeons. And because the lesion excision is bundled to the tissue transfer, the general surgeon will have difficulty gaining payment for his portion of the service.

Possible solutions: In such a case, you have two possible solutions to be sure both surgeons receive payment:

Option 1. Each surgeon reports his portion of the service using modifier 52 (Reduced services). And depending on which surgeon will be assume post-op care, the other should report modifier 54 (Surgical care only).

Example: The general surgeon excises a lesion--for example, 11406, Excision, benign lesion including margins, except skin tag [unless listed elsewhere], trunk, arms or legs; excised diameter over 4.0 cm). The plastic surgeon then performs adjacent tissue transfer (for example, 14021, Adjacent tissue transfer or rearrangement, scalp, arms and/or legs; defect 10.1 sq cm to 30.0 sq cm). The plastic surgeon will assume post-op care of the patient.

In this case, you would report 11406-52 for the general surgeon. Your documentation should explain that the surgeon did not provide closure/wound repair for the excision. And because the plastic [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.