General Surgery Coding Alert

Colonoscopy Confusion May Have Only 1 Solution

Carriers differ on primary diagnosis for -diagnostic- screenings The confusion over how to report screening colon-oscopies that become -diagnostic- has intensified further over the past several months. With no end to the debate in sight, your only answer may be to ask for written instructions from your individual carrier.
 
Background: In February, CMS officials clarified that when a screening colonoscopy finds a polyp, you should bill using the polyp diagnosis, not the screening V code. (See Reader Question, -Screening-vs.-Diagnostic Rules Haven't Changed- on page 39 of the May 2006 General Surgery Coding Alert.)
 
Example: For Medicare patients, you should report G0121 (Colorectal cancer screening; colonoscopy on individual not meeting criteria for high risk) for an average-risk patient receiving a screening colonoscopy, or G0105 (Colorectal cancer screening; colonoscopy on individual at high risk) for a high-risk patient.
 
But if the physician discovers a polyp during the screening, you should instead report a diagnostic colonoscopy ( CPT 45380 , Colonoscopy, flexible, proximal to splenic flexure; with biopsy, single or multiple).
 
And when the surgeon visualizes and biopsies the polyp, you should change the primary diagnosis from V76.51 (Special screening for malignant neoplasms; colon) to, for instance, 211.3 (Benign neoplasm of other parts of digestive system; colon), as outlined in the instructions CMS provided in February.
 
The retraction: Now, CMS officials are distancing themselves from their earlier instruction, pointing to language in the ICD-9 diagnosis coding guidelines that state that you should still use the screening diagnosis even if you find a problem during a screening exam.
 
-Should a condition be discovered during the screening, then the code for the condition may be assigned as an additional diagnosis,- according to ICD-9 instructions.
 
-I didn't mean to say anything that was contrary to the guidance that CMS has given on this subject,- says William Rogers, MD, head of CMS- Physician Regulatory Issues Team. If in Doubt, Ask for Guidance Most carriers have come out in favor of switching to the polyp diagnosis for the excision. But a few, including Trailblazer Health Enterprises, have come down on the side of keeping the V code even if you find a polyp during a screening.
 
In addition: The January 2004 CPT Assistant (published by the AMA) also came down on the side of putting the polyp diagnosis first when the physician finds a polyp and performs a therapeutic procedure, says Chris Felthauser, medical coding instructor for Orion Medical Services in Eugene, Ore.
 
Watch out: A serious problem can occur if you list the screening V code first, because many Medicare carriers won't pay for the polypectomy, says Barbara J. Cobuzzi, MBA, CPC, CPC-H, CPC-P, CHCC, president of CRN Healthcare Solutions in Tinton Falls, N.J. Most carriers don't have the screening code listed as a covered [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

General Surgery Coding Alert

View All