General Surgery Coding Alert

Coding Basics:

'New' or 'Established' Might Matter More Than You Think

2 questions allow you to pick the right code -- and right level -- every time When reporting many common E/M services, you must know two things: 1. Is the patient new or established? 2. What are the documented levels of history, physical exam, and medical decision-making (MDM)?
 
Here are quick instructions on how to use this information to select the correct E/M level every time. -3-Year Rule- Determines Patient Status Generally, you should consider a patient to be -established- if any physician in your group (or, more precisely, any physician of the same specialty billing under the same group number) has seen that patient for a face-to-face service within the past 36 months, says Marvel J Hammer, RN, CPC, CCS-P, ACS-PM, CHCO, owner of MJH Consulting in Denver. A recent CMS transmittal (R731CP, change request 4032) re-enforces the agency's -new/established- patient policy.
 
Don't let different locations lead you astray: If your practice has multiple locations and a physician in location -A- sees the patient in January while a physician at location -B- sees the patient the following December, the patient is still established. The need to create a new chart is inconsequential, Hammer says.
 
Example 1: A primary-care physician recommends that a 60-year-old female see the general surgeon regarding a breast lump. One of the physicians in your practice interpreted some test results for the same patient the previous year but provided no face-to-face service.
 
In this case, you can still consider the patient to be new when selecting an initial E/M code because no physician within your practice provided the patient with a face-to-face service within the past three years, says Kathy Pride, CPC, CCS-P, a consultant with QuadraMed in Port St. Lucie, Fla.
 
Example 2: A patient comes to your office complaining of lower-quadrant pain. Although this is surgeon A's first time meeting the patient, surgeon B, in the same group practice, saw the patient two years ago for a similar complaint.
 
In this case, the patient is established. Exceptions Could Occur for Different Specialties The new patient rule applies when physicians in the same practice are also of the same specialty, says Cindy Parman, CPC, CPC-H, RCC, co-owner of Coding Strategies Inc. in Powder Springs, Ga., and president of the American Academy of Professional Coders- National Advisory Board.
 
In a nutshell: If your practice is big enough and covers enough specialties, two physicians may see a patient for completely different reasons, Parman says. This could allow you to report a new patient visit even though two physicians in the same practice saw the same patient within a three-year period.
 
Example: An internist in a large multiple-specialty practice sees a patient in 2004 for diabetes treatments. In early 2006, the same patient sees your general [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.