General Surgery Coding Alert

2005 Fee Schedule Update:

Don't Expect Payment for "B" Status Codes

A 1.5% increase across the board offset by some disappointing RVUs CMS has unveiled its "Revisions to Payment Policies Under the Physician fee schedule for Calendar Year 2005," which brings higher overall reimbursement, but potentially no payments for some key new procedures.

First, the good news: CMS has increased the Medicare conversion factor to $37.8975 for 2005, up from $37.3374 in 2004 - an increase of about 1.5 percent.

Medicare payers use the conversion factor, along with the relative value units (RVUs) assigned to individual CPT codes, to determine reimbursement amounts.

For example: The fee schedule assigns 6.05 RVUs to 11043 (Debridement; skin, subcutatenous tissue and muscle). To determine payment, multiply the RVUs by the conversion factor, for a total of $229.28.

In addition, Medicare carriers adjust fees depending on the practice's geographic location according to the relative cost of providing healthcare in that area. About half of the 92 geographic areas defined by Medicare will see increases in their geographic adjustment factors (GAFs) in 2005. The rest will either not change or decrease.
 
Example: The GAF for Santa Clara, Calif., will rise 3.4 percent, from 1.184 in 2004 to 1.224 in 2005. Meanwhile, in Manhattan, the GAF will shrink 1.8 percent, from 1.225 to 1.203.
 
Therefore, in the Santa Clara area, for example, payment for 11043 would come to $280.64 ($229.28, as calculated above, multiplied by the GAF of 1.224 = 280.64).

You Could Be Out of Luck for Carrier-Priced Codes On the downside, the fee schedule reveals disappointing news regarding new-for-2005 wound care codes.

Many general surgery coders were thrilled to hear that the AMA created two new codes to represent wound vacuum assisted closure (VAC) services this year, but the fee schedule failed to deliver any RVUs to codes 97605 (Negative pressure wound therapy [e.g., vacuum assisted drainage collection], including topical application[s], wound assessment, and instruction[s] for ongoing care, per session; total wound[s] surface area less than or equal to 50 square centimeters) and 97606 (... total wound[s] surface area greater than 50 square centimeters).

Although CPT Changes 2005 states that these procedures require "work and practice expense different than any of the procedures considered to be selective debridement in the 97000 series," the RVU Committee assigned "B" status indicators to both codes, meaning that the codes will be "carrier priced."

Expect disappointment: "A 'B' status indicator means that no separate payment will be made for the code," says Marvel J Hammer, RN, CPC, CCS-P, CHCO, president of MJH Consulting in Denver. "In most instances, I have not seen individual carriers then price these services separately."
 
In addition, the Nov. 15, 2004 Federal Register explains that, although the review board recommended 0.55 work RVUs for 97605 and 0.60 for 97606, CMS disagreed, stating that when [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

General Surgery Coding Alert

View All