Gastroenterology Coding Alert

You Be the Coder:

Method Overrides Numbers While Reporting Polyp Removal

Question: Our gastroenterologist recently performed a colonoscopy. The operative report read like this:Multiple small and large-mouthed diverticula were found in the sigmoid colon. Estimated blood loss: none. A pedunculated polyp was found in the sigmoid colon. The polyp was 20 mm in size. The polyp was removed with a hot snare. Resection and retrieval were complete. Estimated blood loss: 25 mL requiring treatment with epinephrine and 4 clips. A sessile polyp was found in the sigmoid colon. The polyp was 4 mm in size. Biopsies were taken with a cold forceps for histology. Estimated blood loss: none. Multiple small (>5mm) polyps were found in sigmoid and rectum that were not biopsied. Non-bleeding internal hemorrhoids were found during retroflexion.Let me know what the correct way of reporting the procedure is.New Jersey SubscriberAnswer: Note that your gastroenterologist used two different procedures to remove the polyps, namely, hot snare and cold biopsy forceps. [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Gastroenterology Coding Alert

View All

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.