Gastroenterology Coding Alert

You Be the Coder:

G0105 Proves To Be Irreplaceable For No-Finding Service

Question: My gastroenterologist performed a colonoscopy on a patient who is less than 50 years old with a V16.0 diagnosis. He doesn't have coverage for screening colonoscopy because of his age, but his insurance considers V16.0 a medical diagnosis and could have paid for the service. The colonoscopy revealed no findings. Why did the insurance deny my claim when I billed V16.0 with 45378?Answer: You should have determined the benefits for the procedure and verified the payment before performing it on the patient. Colonoscopy procedures in patients without active symptoms do not qualify as an emergency and the best way to make sure that the physician is paid for the service is to get phone verification of benefits. Moreover, regulation doesn't require insurance coverage for high-risk screening colonoscopy.Although some insurance would accept G0105 (Colorectal cancer screening; colonoscopy on individual at high risk) instead of 45378 (Colonoscopy, flexible, proximal to splenic [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Gastroenterology Coding Alert

View All