Gastroenterology Coding Alert

Same-Day Service and Significant E/M Demands 25

Separate documentation must stress the distinct nature of the E/M

If you fail to report a legitimate, separately identifiable E/M service, your practice misses out on anywhere from $25 to well over $100. Don't let this happen to you: Here are three ways to be sure that you apply modifier 25 correctly for separate E/M services. Significance Is Key for Separate E/M To gain payment for an E/M service the physician provides at the same time as another procedure or service, the E/M must be both significant and separately identifiable.
 
All procedures, from simple injections to common diagnostic tests, include an -inherent- E/M component, according to CMS guidelines. Therefore, any E/M service you report separately must be -above and beyond- the minimal evaluation and management that normally accompanies such a procedure, says Marcella Bucknam, CPC, CCS, CPC-H, CCS-P, HIM program coordinator at Clarkson College in Omaha, Neb.

But modifier 25 is not restricted to a particular level of service, according to CPT Assistant, September 1988.

Example: The gastroenterologist provides a cursory examination prior to a previously scheduled procedure, such as upper GI endoscopy (43235, Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy including esophagus, stomach, and either the duodenum and/or jejunum as appropriate; diagnostic, with or without collection of specimen[s] by brushing or washing [separate procedure]).

In this case, the simple -preprocedure- exam is neither significant nor separately identifiable, and therefore you should not attempt to report it separately.

Tip: -I recommend that coders do the -HEM- test--can you pick out from the documentation a clear history, exam and medical decision-making apart from any other procedures the physician performs on the same day. If so, you-ve probably got a billable service- with modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service), says Laureen Jandroep, OTR, CPC, CCS-P, CPC-H, CCS, director and senior instructor for CRN Institute, an online coding certification training center based in Absecon, N.J.

Bottom line: You should consider a brief history and physical prior to a same-day scheduled outpatient procedure as an included component of the procedure itself.

Even if the physician provides an assessment and plan, you probably should not report a separate E/M service unless the patient has a new, unrelated complaint or has experienced a worsening of symptoms that prompts a new history, exam and medical decision-making process that might include additional testing or therapy. Keep E/M Documentation Apart  When reporting an E/M service on the same day as another procedure, physically separate the documentation for the E/M portion of the service from the procedure documentation. This demonstrates to the payer the E/M service's distinct nature, Jandroep says.

The physician should document the history, exam and medical decision-making in the patient's chart and record [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Gastroenterology Coding Alert

View All

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.