Question: A patient we had not previously seen was referred to our office for a sigmoidoscopy. Our gastroen-terologist accepted this referral, performed the diagnostic test, and sent the documented results with recommendations back to the referring physician. Shouldn't we code this as a consultation? Virginia Subscriber Answer: No, this is not a consultation. Refer to your CPT guidelines, which define a consultation (99241-99263) as a "type of service provided by a physician whose opinion or advice regarding evaluation and/or management of a specific problem is requested by another physician or other appropriate source." Medicare regulations state that they will pay for a consultation that meets three criteria: a request from a referring physician, a patient review, and a written report sent back to the referring physician. In this case, the physician had referred the patient for a procedure and did not specifically request an opinion from the gastroenterologist. And if you took a standard patient history and physical prior to the procedure because you were checking the patient's ability to tolerate the sigmoidoscopy, you cannot separately report these; they're part of the procedure.
At first, it might appear that this as a consultation; however, the key here is that your gastroenterologist was not doing the evaluation or management service that entailed giving advice. The gastroenterologist was not evaluating a complaint, says Beth Mosley, accounts representative at Cary Gastroenterological Associates in North Carolina. He performed the requested sigmoi-doscopy, which is a procedure. The patient required no further evaluation; the referring physician had already specified to your gastroenterologist that he wanted a definite medical procedure.
This opinion is reinforced by Michael Weinstein, MD, a gastroenterologist in Washington, D.C. "I would not recommend submitting a claim for anything other than the procedure if it is a routine exam," he says. Evaluation or treatment needed as a result of a finding on the exam could also prompt a call to the referring physician to discuss the need for a consultation.
But suppose that during the preprocedural physical, the gastroenterologist finds that the patient needs some additional evaluation. In this case, you would probably notify the referring physician that a consultation is now in order. If the referring physician concurs that a consult is needed, the gastroenterologist can perform the appropriate level of E/M consultative service (99241-99245) and can also perform the sigmoidoscopy if needed, Weinstein says. You can bill both services using modifier -25 on the E/M service. Linda Parks, MA, CPC, CCP, lead coder at Atlanta Gastroenterology Associates, concurs, stating that she would not submit an E/M for this visit unless the physician had spoken with the referring physician and it was decided at that point that a consult was needed.