Gastroenterology Coding Alert
Reader Question:
Accurate Number of Points Will Lead You to Accurate MDM Level
Published on Tue Sep 09, 2014
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
Other Articles in this issue of
Gastroenterology Coding Alert
- Endoscopies:
Steer Clear of the Multiple-Endoscopy Limitations With These Pointers
Don’t get confused between multiple-procedure and multiple-scope rules. If you’re convinced that when your gastroenterologist [...] - Fee Schedule:
Your Best Path to Deserved Reimbursement Goes Through RVU method
Look for differences in local and national rates to avoid rejection. The Medicare Physician Fee [...] - ICD-10 Update:
Appendicitis Coding Remains Painless After Changeover
Other diseases of appendix get more accuracy from next year. Think of a gastroenterology practice [...] - Modifiers:
CMS Unveils 4 New Modifiers to Offset Unwarranted Use of 59
Judicious selection and not playing safe will be the key terms for future. Popularity can [...] - Readers Question:
Presence of Earlier PEG will Decide PEJ Coding
Question: Our Gastro conducted a placement of a PEJ tube on a patient who already [...] - Reader Question:
Double Check Documentation for Type of Pouchitis
Question: One of our patients has been diagnosed with pouchitis. Which ICD-9 code should I use? [...] - Reader Question:
Accurate Number of Points Will Lead You to Accurate MDM Level
Question: Our gastroenterologist attended to a patient and noted the following: Assessment: 1.Rectal bleeding, Likely hemorrhoidal; [...] - Reader Question:
Don't Ignore Anemia as a Precursor for Colonoscopy
Question: Can I use the diagnosis of iron deficiency anemia for a colonoscopy? The patient had [...] - You Be the Coder:
Show Necessity for Multiple Polyp Removal Codes
Question: Recently, our gastroenterologist removed three polyps during a colonoscopy procedure using a cauterization. In another [...]
View All
