Gastroenterology Coding Alert

Looking Ahead:

Here's What to Expect in 2021

Although CMS won’t be instituting big changes to E/M coding and documentation when the calendar turns to 2019, it will follow through on some aspects of the single E/M office/outpatient visit payment in future years. The simplified policies base payments “on attributes that do not require separate, complex documentation,” the MPFS fact sheet indicated. Take a look at the top six E/M updates impacting your documentation and payment, starting in 2021

1.  E/M  single  payment  rate  details  revealedThe amount isn’t finalized, but you can expect a single payment rate for level 2 through 4 codes for E/M office/outpatient visits for your new and established patients. CPT® codes 99205 and 99215, however, will no longer fall under the single payment system as suggested before, but instead will remain steady “to better account for the care and needs of complex patients,” the agency stressed.

2. Clinicians can decide which documentation guideline to follow. Despite mixed feelings from the public on three documentation guideline choices, the agency pushed through the policy. In 2021, Medicare providers can use either the 1995 or 1997 documentation guidelines for E/M office/outpatient level 2 through 5 visits,  or they can use medical decision-making (MDM) or time. It is important to mention that some “commenters noted such a policy would increase burden due to increased variation in how visits would be documented, and the need to restructure EHR templates to accommodate different options and decide which method was best for a given patient or practice,” said the final rule.

3. Minimum documentation standard outlined… sort of. Even though “many commentators did not support the proposal… to apply a minimum level 2 documentation standard,” CMS will be instituting it anyway in 2021. What this means is that when you perform a level 2 through 4 visit using MDM or the current standards, you’ll need to submit “information to support a level 2 E/M office/outpatient visit code for history, exam and/or medical decision-making,” the fact sheet noted.

4.  Time  is  of  the  essenceAccording to the guidance, medical necessity must be clearly explained when time is used to document the E/M visit. Also, that documentation needs to specifically point out that it was the billing provider who was face-to-face with the patient for the claim to be accepted.

5.  Add-on  codes  are  comingThose promised add-on codes that are supposed to bump up the single payment stats are set for release in 2021. The aforementioned codes will help explain “additional resources” but won’t be restricted by specialty, CMS said. “These codes would only be reportable with E/M office/outpatient level 2 through 4 visits, and their use generally would not impose new per-visit documentation requirements,” the fact sheet advised.

6.  Extra-long  visits  receive  a  boost. For level 2 through 4 E/M visit codes, CMS will introduce a brand new “extended visit” code, the agency said. Practitioners will be able to use this code “regardless of the kind of care” furnished “or whether or not the medical complexity of the visit is the determining factor for the length of visit,” the final rule stated.

Industry input: As the agency finalizes the logistics of this massive undertaking to streamline E/M documentation and payment with new codes and processes, the American Medical Association (AMA) will be working in tandem with CMS to work out the kinks, according to the organization.

“A two-year window for implementation of the proposal will give the AMA-convened work group— comprised of physicians and other health professionals — time to make recommendations on this complicated topic,” noted Barbara L.  McAneny,  MD, AMA president, in a press release on the E/M changes. “The panel members have deep expertise in defining and valuing codes, and as members of various specialties, they all use the office visit codes to describe and bill for services provided to Medicare patients.” The timeline for these changes — two years — suggests there is ample time for substantial changes to emerge in what CMS is proposing, so stay tuned.