Gastroenterology Coding Alert

Factor in 5 R's for Your 2007 Consults

Discover how you can create a helpful tool for your consult claims Neglecting your consultation (99241-99255) requirements in 2007 could land you in hot water. The old-school three R's have shifted because, in 2006, CMS issued two statements increasing the documentation requirements for consults.

Important: These are Medicare guidelines only, but private payers generally accept them. Reacquaint Yourself With the 3 R-s Traditionally, you could code a consultation (99241-99255) if the encounter met three requirements:

- Request for opinion

- Rendering of services

- Report to the requesting source. First on Medicare's chopping block were qualifying requesters. The new CMS guidelines require a physician or qualified nonphysician practitioner (NPP) to make the request. CPT specifies, however, that the request can be from a physician or other appropriate source.
 
Note: Medicare limits the definition for the NPP category of provider to a nurse practitioner, physician's assistant, clinical nurse specialist, or certified nurse midwife.

Protect Yourself With Written Reason and Request In December 2005, CMS added reason to the consultation R-s. Transmittal 788 requires that the requesting physician or NPP document the request and the reason for a consult in the patient's medical record. This advice existed as spoken instruction, but it had never before been given in writing, says Barbara J. Cobuzzi, MBA, CPC, CPC-H, CPC-P, CHCC, president of CRN Healthcare Solutions in Tinton Falls, N.J.

Helpful tool: To help ensure that requesting physicians meet the new requirement, Cobuzzi suggests creating a reverse-request fax consultation form. Consultants can fax the form to the requesting physician to be filed in the patient's chart. -We can't make [the requesting source] file the form, but using the tool at least
increases the chances that there is something in the chart,- Cobuzzi says. CMS Partially Lets Consultants off the Hook The ensuing paperwork trail led CMS to reconsider the feasibility of making the consultant responsible for the requesting physician's documentation. -On April 18, 2006, the PRIT (Physician Regulatory Issues Team) released a statement stating that they do not expect the consulting physician to verify that the ordering physician has documented the consultation request in the patient's chart,- says Diane Daigle, president of Maine Medical Group Management Association. When an appropriate source requests a consult, the consultant isn't responsible for making sure the requesting physician's files include that request in writing.

That's not all: CMS officials still insist that the requesting physician has to document the request for a consult. The only change is that the consultant doesn't have to verify that the initiating doctor has done so.

So what will happen if a carrier audits the consultant and doesn't find any request documented in the requesting physician's files? Will the consultant still get paid? At this point, CMS hasn't been able to answer [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Gastroenterology Coding Alert

View All

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.