ED Coding and Reimbursement Alert

Reader Question:

Extravasation of Contrast Material

Question: We have doctors who use extravasation of contrast material as a diagnosis. I interpret this to mean that the patient entered the emergency department (ED) because of a complication of the above procedure. Is this correct? If so, what should the doctors document as the proper diagnosis?

Diane Valenzuela
Sunwest Billing Service, El Paso, Texas

Answer: According to Tabers Encyclopedic Medical Dictionary, extravasation is the escape of fluids into the surrounding tissues. Your question suggests that a patient is coming to the ED after a radiologic procedure that used contrast material, and that the contrast material is leaking into another area of the body, says Lamon Willis, CPC, a consultant in Jacksonville, Fla., who specializes in ED physician coding.

There are several diagnoses that can be used and are listed in the ICD-9 manual under the extravasation heading in the index. You must determine, however, whether the patient has a complication of the contrast material/radiologic procedure or a hemorrhagic condition. Only then can you steer your doctor toward a clear diagnosis for billing purposes.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more