ED Coding and Reimbursement Alert

Reader Question:

Don't Let 2nd Service Wrap Into Global Care

Question: I received a denial from Medicare for a patient who had two hip dislocation reductions performed about 60 days apart. I used modifier -54 on both, but the second visit keeps getting denied because Medicare states that the physician performed it during the global period for the initial procedure. Are there any other modifiers I should use to justify this work? Alabama Subscriber Answer: Instead of appending modifier -54 (Surgical care only), you should consider using modifier -59 (Distinct procedural service) to identify the second reduction as a distinct procedural service. The second reduction is really the result of a different injury that the physician treated during a separate session, so you should report it as such. And you might want to submit the emergency room notes to clarify your position.

Otherwise, the 90-day global period should cover all normal services involved with the billed procedure. You should also double-check with your local payer -- many have different policies on additional services provided during a global period, and knowing what they are will save you time and trouble in the future.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

ED Coding and Reimbursement Alert

View All