ED Coding and Reimbursement Alert
Reader Question:
Cerumen Removal May Not Be Billable
Published on Thu Aug 31, 2017
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
Related Articles
Other Articles in this issue of
ED Coding and Reimbursement Alert
- Modifiers:
This Major Payer Now Requires Modifier SA on E/Ms Performed by NPPs
When your NP, PA, or CNS performs an E/M, you'll need to append modifier SA [...] - Part B Errors:
This ED Error Is Among CMS's Examples of How Not to Report Claims
Check out the highlights from the government's latest error report to find out what auditors [...] - ICD-10:
Your ED Will Have New Substance Abuse Dx Options on Oct.1
The upcoming edition of ICD-10 will offer several new options for patients who have substance [...] - You Be the Coder:
Check for the Right Tonsillitis Code
Question: Which diagnosis code should we report for acute tonsillitis? Codify Subscriber Answer: Fortunately, EDs that [...] - Reader Question:
Know When to Bill Two Insurers
Question: We saw a workers' compensation patient who presented with asthma due to inhaling wood dust [...] - Reader Question:
Observation Codes Are on RACs' Radar Screens
Question: Our physician was one of the doctors who saw a patient in observation care in [...] - Reader Question:
Adverse Effects May Prompt Additional Codes
Question: Our ED physician gave a theophylline prescription to a patient with asthma, but the next [...] - Reader Question:
Even in the ED, PFSH Matters
Question: Our doctors are great about documentation, except in one area. They rarely include any information [...] - Reader Question:
Cerumen Removal May Not Be Billable
Question: The ED physician saw an 18-year-old female patient with complaints of ear pressure and reduced [...] - Reader Question:
Know the X-Ray Coding Rules
Question: For an x-ray that included three shoulder views, our coder reported 73020-59 (one view) and [...]
View All
