ED Coding and Reimbursement Alert
Reader Question:
At First Those Earrings Looked Like An Accident, But Eventually They Grow On You
Published on Wed Jul 24, 2013
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
Other Articles in this issue of
ED Coding and Reimbursement Alert
- Audit Strategies:
Are These 2 HPI Glitches Putting You At Risk For E/M Audit Scrutiny?
How the “Acuity Caveat” could be sabotaging your documentation. As an ED coder, you’re facing [...] - Proposed Medicare Fee Schedule 2014:
Breaking News: EDs Could See A 3 Percent Increase in Medicare Payments
The CMS proposed Rule Gives a Preview of What To Expect in 2014 More cash [...] - Compare 2013 and 2014 Proposed RVUs For ED Related E/M codes
- How do you decide which category describes the repair in question?
A simple repair is usually single layer, with no particulates, no contamination. You’ll report simple [...] - You Be the Coder:
Can You Report an E/M When Procedures Are The Primary Reason For a Visit?
Question: We had this chart recently that mostly seems to be about sewing up the [...] - Reader Question:
At First Those Earrings Looked Like An Accident, But Eventually They Grow On You
Question: Can I please get other opinions on the correct ICD-9 code for an infected [...] - Reader Question:
All Observation Codes Require At Least A Detailed History
Question: We just received a denial for a moderate level observation care service (99235), and [...] - Reader Question:
Apply Reduced Services Modifier For Unsuccessful Procedures
Question: A patient came into the ED with a medial dislocation of his elbow. The [...] - Reader Question:
Choose Only One Code for Multiple Observations
Question: I have an operative report in front of me that indicates two of our [...]
View All
