Measuring total removal lengths is a no-no ... here's why. Wrong: CPT, Experts Agree: Don't Add Lengths When your physician removes multiple lesions, "code for each individual lesion; this is not like laceration repairs, where you combine the length of all of the same body area/complexity wounds," explains Sharon Richardson, RN, compliance officer at Emergency Groups' Office in Arcadia, Calif. "Report separately each benign [or malignant] lesion excised," reads the CPT 2010 guidelines preceding each lesion excision section: Depending on the nature and location of the lesions, however, you may need to employ modifiers on multiple lesion removals. Example: The physician performs a pair of simple benign lesion excisions: a 1.3 cm lesion from the patient's face and a 1.8 cm lesion from the patient's neck. The physician then writes a five-day antibiotic prescription and a 10-day prescription for Tylenol #3. On this claim, Richardson recommends reporting the following codes: • 11422 (Excision, benign lesion including margins,except skin tag [unless listed elsewhere], scalp, neck, hands, feet, genitalia; excised diameter 1.1 to 2.0 cm) forthe neck lesion removal • 11442 (Excision, other benign lesion including margins, except skin tag [unless listed elsewhere], face, ears, eyelids, nose, lips, mucous membrane; excised diameter 1.1 to 2.0 cm) for the facial lesion removal • modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service) appended to 11442 to indicate the separate nature of the removals -- if the insurer requires it** • 99283 (Emergency department visit for the evaluation and management of a patient, which requires these 3 key components: an expanded problem focused history; an expanded problem focused examination; and medical decision making of moderate complexity ...) for the E/M service • modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service) appended to 99283 to show that the E/M and lesionremovals were separate services **Alternate scenario: You Won't Always Need Modifier 59 If the lesions are in different anatomic areas -- or if the lesions differ in pathology -- the payer might want you to code the removals separately without any modifiers. Other payer peculiarities might include wanting o see modifier 51 (Multiple procedures) on multiple lesion removal claims. Best bet: