Advanced Search

ED Coding and Reimbursement Alert

Eye Claims for Cerumen Removal … and a Possible $30 Boost

Published on Fri Oct 01, 2010

Earwax treatment always equals E/M ... but sometimes it warrants a procedure, too. Listen up, coders: Patients reporting to the ED for removal of earwax exist on the fault line between ED E/M service and procedure code. Knowing the difference could net you about $30 more per claim. Check out these clues for help making the decision between a procedure code and an E/M on your earwax encounters. Choose E/M If Procedure Isn't a Clinical 'Removal' It might seem like a slam dunk: Patient reports to the ED with earwax, provider removes it, and coder chooses cerumen removal code ... right? Wrong: Some earwax extraction encounters will not reach the procedure level. In order to report a cerumen removal code, the provider has to use direct visualization (via otoscope) to remove impacted cerumen, says Sandra Pinckney, CPC, coder at Certified Emergency Medicine Specialists PC in Grand Rapids, Mich. The methods [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

ED Coding and Reimbursement Alert

View All