Cardiology Coding Alert
You Be the Coder:
Understand 33990 vs. 33991 to Prevent a $200 Mistake
Published on Mon Jul 14, 2014
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
Other Articles in this issue of
Cardiology Coding Alert
- CCI:
Spot These Easy-to-Miss Bundling Changes, Implemented July 1
Stent placement and fluoroscopy updates could affect your claims. “Swap” is the name of the [...] - News You Can Use:
Novitas Says CMS Has Delayed Implementation of Pacemaker NCD
Novitas Part A announced that CMS will delay implementation of the national coverage determination (NCD) [...] - E/M:
Earn $20 in 5 Minutes With These 99211 Tips
Thorough documentation is a must even for these quick visits. Many coders refer to 99211 [...] - ICD-10-CM:
Documentation of Right or Left is Key to Choosing Correct Atherosclerosis Code
Watch for whether your I70.21- code needs to be paired with chronic total occlusion, too. [...] - Reader Question:
Only an Echo? Check New Patient E/M Rule
Question: We’ve been getting a denial for new patient code 99204. The only service the physician [...] - Reader Question:
Smoking Cessation Code Depends on Symptom Presence
Question: If Medicare has G codes for smoking cessation visits, why does the fee schedule say 99406 [...] - Reader Question:
Check ICD-9 and ICD-10 Options for Enlarged Aorta
Question: Which diagnosis code should I use for an enlarged abdominal aorta? It hasn’t been confirmed [...] - Reader Question:
Look for More Than HPI to Decide E/M Level
Question: Does an extended HPI guarantee a higher-level E/M code? Washington Subscriber Answer: No, an extended history [...] - You Be the Coder:
Understand 33990 vs. 33991 to Prevent a $200 Mistake
Question: Which code should I report for pVAD replacement? Illinois Subscriber Answer: When the physician removes [...]
View All
