Advanced Search

Cardiology Coding Alert

You Be the Coder:

Knock Out 93650, Pacemaker Scenario

Published on Sat Jun 27, 2009

Question: I know that 93650's descriptor says it covers ablation "with or without temporary pacemaker placement." Does that mean temporary pacemaker placement is included in the service, or may I code it separately? Kansas Subscriber Answer: You should not report temporary pacemaker placement performed at the same time as the ablation, 93650 (Intracardiac catheter ablation of atrioventricular node function, atrioventricular conduction for creation of complete heart block, with or without temporary pacemaker placement). Rationale: CPT designates both 33210 (Insertion or replacement of temporary transvenous single chamber cardiac electrode or pacemaker catheter [separate procedure]) and 33211 (Insertion or replacement of temporary transvenous dual chamber pacing electrodes [separate procedure]) as "separate procedures." CPT's "Surgery Guidelines" indicate that you should not report "separate procedure" codes in addition to the service code it's an integral component of. Cardiologists may place the temporary pacemaker at the same session as ablation because an AV node ablation [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Cardiology Coding Alert

View All