Question: Our physician unsuccessfully attempted an elective cardioversion. Does the procedure code need to be appended with a modifier? If so, which one?
Wyoming Subscriber
If the elective cardioversion was performed and completed regardless of whether the patients heartbeat was converted to a regular rhythm 92960 (cardioversion, elective, electrical conversion of arrhythmia; external) should be reported without any modifiers appended. If, however, the cardioversion was attempted but had to be discontinued because of the patients condition, such as a reaction to anesthesia or respiratory distress, 92960 should be billed with modifier -53 (discontinued procedure) appended.
Mueller notes that successful conversions are often performed quickly, and physicians generally spend far more time unsuccessfully trying to convert a heartbeat. If you did everything you needed to do you used the proper techniques, administered medication, etc. and the patient still did not convert, the procedure should be considered complete.
Modifier -52 (reduced services) would not be appropriate in this situation because it implies that a service was performed to completion, albeit in a reduced fashion. If the cardiologist performed all the necessary steps for the cardioversion but was ultimately unsuccessful in converting the patients heartbeat, the service has not been reduced. Therefore, modifier -52 should not be appended, unless your carrier specifically instructs you (in writing) to do so.
Mueller notes that appending modifier -53 spurs an automatic carrier review, and therefore excellent documentation, indicating the time involved in the procedure and the cause of termination, is required