Advanced Search

Cardiology Coding Alert

You Be the Coder:

Decide ICD Codes for This Case

Published on Thu Sep 06, 2012

Question: How should I code the following case? The cardiologist removed two ICD leads and then placed two new leads (one in the right ventricle, one in the left). This was done transvenously under fluoro. The device (pulse generator) was removed prior to lead extraction, and the same generator was put back in place at the end. After the system was in place, the cardiologist performed an electrophysiologic study to determine adequacy of defibrillation thresholds. He induced ventricular fibrillation and successfully cardioverted the patient.California SubscriberAnswer: Because the cardiologist did not insert a new pulse generator, you should code the lead extraction, lead insertion, and electrophysiologic (EP) study. You should not code for insertion and replacement of the existing pulse generator.For the extraction, report 33244 (Removal of single or dual chamber pacing cardioverter-defibrillator electrode[s]; by transvenous extraction). The appropriate code for lead insertion is 33217 (Insertion of 2 transvenous electrodes, permanent pacemaker [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Cardiology Coding Alert

View All