Cardiology Coding Alert

Test Yourself:

Opt for -22 Over an Unlisted-Procedure Code

Question: Our physician asks us to report procedures that take extra time and effort with an unlisted-procedure code so he can better explain what he did and why it didn't exactly fall under a CPT code. He also says that the payer will have to read the operative report so there is a better chance for reimbursement. I think we should be submitting the procedure code with modifier -22. Who is right?

New Jersey Subscriber

Answer: You can adopt this new rule of thumb: Don't use an unlisted-procedure code instead of modifier -22 (Unusual procedural services) to report additional time and effort spent performing a procedure.

Claims for unlisted-procedure codes and claims using modifier -22 both require the same amount of documentation, and they take equally as much effort to submit. What's the difference? If your claim for modifier -22 is denied, you will be paid the fee for the procedure code alone. But if the carrier denies your unlisted-procedure code claim, there's the possibility that the physician may not receive any reimbursement.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Cardiology Coding Alert

View All