Cardiology Coding Alert

Require More Than 'ECG Normal' for Report

Look to this Medicare manual for documentation guidance.Before you report the professional component of an electrocardiography (ECG) service, be sure you meet the "interpretation and report" requirements of the code. For instance, in explaining which provider should claim ECG services in an emergency department, Medicare Claims Processing Manual (MCPM), Chapter 13, Section 100.1, states that carriers distinguish between an ECG "interpretation and report," which is billable, and a "review," which is not. So if you're considering reporting 93010 (Electrocardiogram, routine ECG with at least 12 leads; interpretation and report only), a review note stating "ECG normal" is not sufficient support, says Kim Huey, CPC, CCS-P, CHCC, an independent coding consultant in Auburn, Ala., citing the MCPM. Such a note "would not suffice as a separately payable interpretation and report of the procedure and should be considered a review of the findings payable through the E/M code. An 'interpretation and report' [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Cardiology Coding Alert

View All

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.