Advanced Search

Cardiology Coding Alert

Reader Questions:

Take Your ROS up a Notch

Published on Thu Jul 20, 2006

Question: What is the difference between review of systems (ROS) levels?

California Subscriber Answer: Four ROS levels exist that contribute to the level of history selected for an E/M service. ROS progresses from "nonavailable" to "problem-pertinent" to "extended" and "complete."
 
In a problem-pertinent ROS, the cardiologist asks questions about the system directly related to the problem identified in the history of present illness (HPI).
 
When the physician asks about a limited number of additional systems, he meets the criteria for an extended ROS. Important: Documentation must include positive responses and pertinent negatives for two to nine systems, according to both the 1995 and 1997 Documentation Guidelines for E/M Services.
 
A complete ROS requires inquiring about all organ systems. The physician must review at least 10 organ systems and individually document those systems with positive responses and pertinent negatives. Tip: For the remaining systems, he can use a notation to indicate that all other systems are negative. Without such a notation, he must individually document at least 10 systems in order for the documentation to support a complete ROS
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Cardiology Coding Alert

View All