Cardiology Coding Alert
Reader Questions:
Memorize Definition of 'Multiple Lead' Pacemaker
Published on Wed Apr 08, 2015
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
Other Articles in this issue of
Cardiology Coding Alert
- Peripheral Vascular:
Combine CPT® and LCD Rules to Get Your EVAT Coding Off on the Right Foot
Pinpoint the method to avoid a $340 mistake. If you’re one of the cardiology practices [...] - Catheterization:
Understand 93503's Purpose So Your Reimbursement Doesn't Take a Dive
Don’t overlook opportunities to report Swan-Ganz catheterization. When your cardiologist places a Swan-Ganz catheter not [...] - ICD-10-CM:
Look Beyond R00.0's Descriptor for Proper Tachycardia Coding
Count on the index to keep your coding for sinus tachycardia on the right path. [...] - Reader Questions:
+93462 Is OK With Combined RHC/LHC
Question: Why does the cardiologist perform a transseptal puncture during a combined right and left heart [...] - Reader Questions:
Memorize Definition of 'Multiple Lead' Pacemaker
Question: How should I bill for interrogation of biventricular pacemakers with one lead each in the [...] - Reader Questions:
Consider XU for Diagnostic Study With Angioplasty
Question: How should I report the procedures below from an antegrade approach for limb salvage? Diagnostic [...] - Reader Questions:
Stop Before Reporting S1 Intervention Using Add-On
Question: Per CPT® the LAD includes the diagonals as branches. Can you bill separately for the [...] - You Be the Coder:
Set Yourself Up for Facility SPECT Success
Question: The cardiologist interpreted SPECT Cardiolite images, rest and stress, for a test performed at the [...]
View All
